After you understand the problem
Three asks.Not a mood.
Specific demands tied to openings that already exist — a pending case, a missing oversight body, and the privacy test the state must pass.
Pause live facial recognition at protests
Stop live FRT at protests and public gatherings until Parliament passes a law that defines when, how, and against which databases it can be used.
Delhi Police FRT vans (reported as “Ikshana”) at the July 2026 Jantar Mantar protests are already before the Delhi High Court. A pause is a concrete interim ask while that petition is pending — not a wish for abolition in the abstract.
Independent judicial oversight for NATGRID
Require independent, judicial oversight for NATGRID — not a shutdown. Every comparable intelligence-grid system in other democracies has an oversight body; this one runs on Home Ministry executive authority alone.
There is no dedicated statute and no independent oversight body today. Oversight is the gap; that is the ask.
Mandatory public disclosure of aggregate use
Publish quarterly aggregate numbers — scans run, queries made, by which agency. No identities. Transparency without doxxing.
Without numbers, the public cannot check whether the intrusion is proportionate under India’s 2017 privacy ruling. Disclosure is the minimum condition for that test to mean anything outside a courtroom.